![]() ![]() The equal to an RDS with Magnifier as a matter of practice, IMO, with addition of some holdovers. The Steiner definitely has a close quarters bias. Its sub-tensions work and are decreasing in width, and un-numbered, which has its benefits. The reticle can be used to do some ranging (kinda-sorta if you had to), but I’d not call it fast or obvious in the same way the Credo is. The Steiner is simple and well designed to draw attention to the center. I think is the best general purpose/scout-ish of the three. The doughnut does something the others don’t. It is not ACSS usable, but it works fine for a BDC. The segmented circle works in 6MOA breaks and at 18MOA total width makes on the fly distance calculations workable. It is also the only one that provides any meaningful ranging ability based on the reticle. The Credo is most useable over a spectrum for me. This is certainly role dependent and subjective so YMMV
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |